Having started my latest professional venture, just two months ago I joined the intellectual folks over at Pythian as a Google Cloud Solutions Architect. Being fully focused on building out and developing their Google Cloud Platform (GCP) practice, I had the opportunity to attend the Google Cloud Next ’17 conference in San Francisco, a couple of weeks ago. After attending the conference, and returning home to catch up on all the work that piled up during that week, I was invited to come on the Datascape Podcast, by its host Chris Presley to discuss my thoughts and reflections on the event.
Enough of my rambling, check out the podcast episode below, and hear my thoughts about the Google Cloud, announcements of new upcoming features, and how I believe it fairs among other public cloud services available today.
If you enjoyed this episode and want to hear more episodes on the Datascape Podcast you can listen/subscribe to it at SoundCloud, iTunes, and TuneIn.
Note: I made the error of assuming that Google I/O was no more, and that Google Cloud Next took its place. I was 100% wrong about this, probably because I was so taken with this event that I missed any marketing content promoting Google I/O… sorry Google! 😉
I read the news yesterday about a partnership that is being formed between VMware and Amazon Web Services (AWS), in an effort to ease the deployment of hybrid cloud architectures in the enterprise space. First thought that came to mind: “Finally!!!”
I’m pretty consistent at following news in the tech market these days, and have been so for a few years. Every once in a while I come across a news headline that sparks a twinkle in my eye, mainly because I can instantly envision the value that’s being created by said piece of news. This is one of those moments, and one of those news headlines.
As we’ll be heading out to the LG V10 launch event later this evening, I decided to go online and do some research on the device to see what the hype’s all about. We were previously invited to the LG G4 launch, months ago, and let me just say that while the smartphone is technically a good product, the presenters fell short on highlighting the technical aspects that make it so.
A client approached me recently wanting to move their entire infrastructure to the cloud. Besides the need to follow the hype of the cloud, I also understand such requests from clients in this country, especially considering the costs associated with maintaining a decent server room. Considering the lack of reliable electricity, the CapEx and OpEx to be spent on power systems to compensate for that, as well as the cooling requirements for even the smallest server room, is quite a handful. This poses a threat for almost any small business nowadays (which is what the majority of businesses around here are by international standards), especially in a country where most of the local software houses are still coding in a “legacy” manner (to put it nicely). So we have a market producing legacy client/server applications that require locally hosted servers, and a national infrastructure that justifies cloud migration more than any I’ve seen to-date.
I dove into my research to try and find a solution to this issue and resolve my client’s pains. Now, I’m the first to say that migrating an application to the cloud isn’t a simple 1-2-3 process, which is why my very instinct was to tell him “Ditch this software and find something that’s web-based.” Unfortunately that’s not a viable solution (as expected) since the
So when are we going to start seeing a trend of connected cars that have built-in LTE radios and WiFi? Or trains? Or busses? Or even taxis?
I’ve already seen this rolled out in a few places around the world, such as specific train rides from airports to city centers, or certain tour busses in certain cities, but I’m talking about a lot more than just that.
Don’t get me wrong, I understand the convenience of having LTE deployed on the mobile phone. It’s nice to always be connected because you never know when you’re gonna get that important email, or that news notification, or even that phone call (when VoLTE-type technologies finally make it to prime time). I’m not even against this, but then again, we’ve seen it in many other tech trends, that idea of tiering different technologies.
In such a case, as this one, tiered wireless systems would be classified to identify different wireless technologies for different coverage scales. Most people don’t know this, Bluetooth is classified as a Personal Area Network (PAN) technology, i.e. it is meant to provide sufficient coverage for your personal space—does this ring a bell with the current IoT craze?